The Hindu Grief

This fact cannot be ignored that a country which was the centre of the Vedic religion in the world still has a majority population of followers of Hinduism, an aftermath of the Vedic religion, though our country is a secular one.

After Independence, Hinduism or Hindutva has often been used for political gains, not by those parties who have Hindutva on their agenda but by those who oppose it.

Another fact cannot also be ignored that the terrorist activities which started in the backdrop of Jihadi movement and Pakistan's illegitimate demand for Kashmir had almost every terrorist belonging to the "so called minority community in India". The beginning of this 3rd millenium saw internal terrorist attacks on Hindu holy places like that of Varanasi etc.

The so called secular parties, who under the garb of this shit of "secularism", only try to appease those who are not from the majority community have now started blaming the Hindu groups of professing "Saffron Terrorism". Recent confessions by certain Hindu chieftans of their involvement in Ajmer and Malegaon blast raises serious questions in the minds of the people from the majority community in this country. This has given the so called Secular parties weapon against the Hindu Nationalist organisations like RSS and parties like the BJP.

But a flipside is also to be seen where these so called Secular parties like that of the ruling Congress and its allies at the UPA instead of fighting their own internal failures of rampant corruption and monstrous NAXALISM and CROSS BORDER TERRORISM have instead got this new JINNIE of BHAGVA AATANKVAAD.

I ask these so called "secular monsters" that:

1. In a country where out of 130 crores of people, atleast 85 crores are HINDUS, can't even mere 85 people be extremists, and has the involvement of such meagre numbers created terrorism?
2. Why are these secular monsters not paying heed to the fact that in almost all activities of terrorists at places of National importance, the involvement of only the Jihadi terrorists have been there?
3. Are the National Guests AJMAL KASAB and AFZAL GURU Hindus?
4. In an atmosphere of fear and pressure of these secular monsters which they have created in the minds of the majority community by regular appeasement of the so called minority community just for vote bank, isn't it expected that atleast some handful people would be so enraged that it would force them to take to such activities of violence and terror in the country? Till what time would they remain silent?

The probable answers which can be gathered from the current prevailing scenario are that these parties and their ministers and leaders, only to hide their misdeeds of corruption and their impotency in fighting any of the problems facing the country, have started highlighting this new concept of SAFFRON TERRORISM.

Its an accepted fact that there are around 42 Islamic Nations in the world which are governed by the Sharia Law and many more countries having Christianity as state religion, which have their respective Blasphemy laws in action, where majority of population is sensitive about the religion. This reminds me of a recent incident in Pakistan where a Governor of a Punjab State was shot dead by a his own staunch orthodox Sunni Muslim gunman who was so hurt by his statements against the Islamic Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan that he could not control himself and fearlessly shot him dead. As if this was not sufficient, all the supporters of the Islamic Sharia Blasphemy Law greeted him when he was being presented before the Magistrate as if he had done a gallantry task of high reward.

The point I want to convey is that the condition in India is totally different and I appreciate and hold in high esteem the Indian Constitutional spirit.

But its good for these secular monsters that India does not have a Hindu Blasphemy Law of its own, despite being a Hindu Majority Nation (Hinduism can never have a Law like Blasphemy for it has been the most tolerant religion till date in the world, and that's commendable!!!). Had there been any such law in India as well, all these so called secular monsters would have suffered the same fate as those in Pakistan and other countries. They should thank the Almighty that those people, who they name - SAFFRON TERRORISTS, are tolerant Nationalists and though a handful of them indulge in activities, I also condemn.

In legal parlance it said that there is a rule and it has exceptions. These handful people from Hindu extremist groups should be considered an exception to the rule which still is that almost all anti-national terrorists are Jihadis. And these so called secular parties should restrain from impugning organisations like RSS and parties like BJP for acts which are not a rule but an exception to the rule.

Governments in Bihar and Gujarat have shown that the Hindutva agenda is taking a back-foot for BJP and allies but now it seems that the parties accusing BJP of its Hindutva agenda, are not able to digest this trend..

The question now remains:

WHO WANTS HINDUTVA and "SAFFRONISM" alive for political gains: the BJP or Congress & UPA????